Saturday, February 2, 2019

High Defamation Podcast Episode 2: Best Coast Anarchy and Brazilian Chaos



Anchor | iTunes | Stitcher
Facebook Group: High Defamation

Got a little personal with this one, giving up some backstory. Tracing my path from starter pack punk rock and UK anarcho punk to discovering the crustier, more metallic and abrasive beginnings of US, west cast specifically, anarchic hardcore, with a diversion to the wilds of Brazil. It's a journey told as a timeline and one that I hope sheds some light on my own journey through music, eventually landing me where I currently am in this quagmire of tunes.

Special thanks to Bryan K Ward and anyone else involved with Christdriver for permission to use the Consumer, which goes great lengths to illustrate the contrast of their own evolution from Subvert to another beast entirely.

And also my apologies for any butchering I may have done of the Portuguese language while trying to discuss the Brazilian groups. I get an A for effort, right?


Tracklist:
  1. SUBVERT "The Madness Must End"
  2. SUBVERT "What Does it Mean"
  3. CHRISTDRIVER "Consumer"
  4. FINAL WARNING "Out of ight, Out of Mind (Live)"
  5. FINAL WARNING "I Quit"
  6. CRUCIFIX "You're Too Old"
  7. CRUCIFIX "Indo China"
  8. CHRIST ON PARADE "Chaos Breeder"
  9. CHRIST ON PARADE "Rock & Roll Armageddon"
  10. DOGMA MUNDISTA "Sky Turns Black"
  11. GLYCINE MAX "Crust Core"
  12. RATOS DE PORÃO "Crucificados Pelo Sistema"
  13. LOBOTOMIA "Só os Mortos Não Reclamam"
  14. LOBOTOMIA "Penso, Logo Desisto (Mas Insisto)"
  15. NÃO RELIGIÃO "Semelhantes"

4 comments:

Unknown said...

The misdeed of defamation is perceived as an individual’s right to protect his good name as well as reputation from unjust attacks of other people. This Defamation Act 2009 thus sets out a defined law applicable in all the different regions of Ireland.

solicitors said...

Defamation is usually defined as the situation when anyone makes a false statement of fact regarding you. And unfortunately, you have to suffer some harm from that statement, either reputational harm or financial damage

solicitors said...

Defamation is defined as a case that involves a false statement regarding anyone that harms his reputation. That statement may be either libel or slander.
1. Libel refers to conditions in which a written statement negatively affecting a person’s reputation is published online or offline.
2. Slander refers to circumstances where a negative statement impacting a person’s reputation is either oral or spoken.
However, whatever the case may be. There is always a fine line between freedom of speech and publication of anyone’s opinion in a precise manner. In either way, you should not harm any other person’s reputation.

solicitors said...

Filing a defamation claim in the court requires the help of a local defamation solicitor to pursue litigation in the proper jurisdiction. And hiring local counsel lawyers is often necessary in several internet defamation cases. Mainly where the claim’s defendant is somewhere outside the jurisdiction. Thus, such cases require a solicitor to practice with an authentic license.